Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ricardas Berankis vs James McCabe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Berankis vs McCabe analysis and find out who is favored!
Ricardas Berankis vs James McCabe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Berankis has won 50.15% of points on his second serve, while McCabe has won 52.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Berankis, in recent form, has won 53.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while McCabe has won 45.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.48% and 32.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Berankis has saved 60.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McCabe has saved 62.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Berankis has won 56.9% of matches played (W/L 33/ 25), with McCabe winning 50.85% (W/L 30/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Berankis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 218/ 107), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 66/ 65). McCabe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 87/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Berankis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21), where as McCabe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Berankis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Berankis winning 2 and McCabe winning 0. The last match between Berankis and McCabe was at the Gwangju Challenger, 18-04-2024, Second, Hard with Ricardas Berankis getting the victory 7-6(6) 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Berankis and McCabe have played a deciding set 0 times, with Berankis winning 0 times and McCabe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Berankis winning 2, and McCabe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Berankis has played against opponents with an average rank of 328.12 while McCabe has played against players with an average rank of 213.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Berankis has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McCabe has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Berankis has converted 40.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and McCabe has converted 41.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Berankis 1 - 0 McCabe
324
Rank
50
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
351
Rank
258
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
60% (577-383)
Career Total W/L
59% (105-74)
63% (22-13)
YTD W/L
57% (20-15)
$2,395,158
Career Prize Money
$17,900
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ricardas Berankis | James McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:20:59 | 2:20:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (59/105) | 65% (59/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (42/59) | 73% (43/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (23/46) | 38% (12/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (36/91) | 38% (40/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Ricardas Berankis
Player
James McCabe
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ricardas Berankis | James McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (22/13) | 57% (20/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (49/38) | 54% (44/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (436/391) | 53% (413/369) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 55% (16/13) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.65 |
| Aces Total | 121 | 249 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:10 | 1:50:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 270.66 | 191.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1447/2464) | 59% (1464/2464) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1014/1447) | 72% (1051/1464) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (510/1017) | 53% (527/1000) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (109/270) | 41% (92/224) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1036/2545) | 37% (916/2472) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (20/13) | 63% (12/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (21/34) | 58% (19/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 33% (6/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (11/16) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (15/5) | 13% (16/2) |
Ricardas Berankis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ricardas Berankis
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Antoine Escoffier
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Brandon Holt
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Ricardas Berankis
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Ricardas Berankis
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Ricardas Berankis
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
James McCabe
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
James McCabe
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jose Statham
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
James McCabe
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Egor Gerasimov
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
32 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Federico Bondioli
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
James McCabe
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Berankis Vs McCabe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
